Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Big money...not

Rothko and Johns Paintings Are Stars of a Sluggish Auction for Sotheby’s

Photo
Jasper Johns’s “Flag,” signed and dated 1983, sold for $36 million on Tuesday night. Credit 2014 Jasper Johns/Licensed by VAGA, New York, NY

    The week of big-money contemporary art auctions got off to a sluggish start on Tuesday evening at Sotheby’s, where collectors could not be bullied by high estimates and tastes veered toward abstract rather than figurative paintings.
    Compared with Sotheby’s victory on Monday, when a group of 43 masterworks from the estate of Rachel Lambert Mellon, better known as Bunny, soared well above expectations, the sale on Tuesday often saw thin or controlled bidding. Almost half of the works were guaranteed, meaning Sotheby’s or an outside party had promised the seller an undisclosed sum regardless of the sale’s outcome, and many dealers said afterward that they guessed the gambles did not always pay off.


    Compared with what Christie’s has coming up on Wednesday night at Rockefeller Center, Sotheby’s auction seemed modest. Still, there were some high prices paid for works by Mark Rothko, Jasper Johns and Gerhard Richter. “On the best things there was lots of competition,” Alexander Rotter, co-head of Sotheby’s contemporary art department worldwide, said after the sale.
    Mr. Rotter was talking about the success of Rothko’s abstract canvases. Two of them were the stars of the Mellon sale on Monday, and on Tuesday, the most expensive painting of the evening was the artist’s “No. 21 (Red, Brown, Black and Orange).” Executed in 1951, it sold to a telephone bidder for $45 million. Its provenance was pristine, having come from the collection of the Houston oil billionaire Pierre Schlumberger and his wife, São, though the canvas failed to reach its high estimate of $50 million.
    Of the 78 works in the auction, 11 failed to sell. The auction totaled $343.6 million, just squeaking above its low $323.1 million estimate, but far short of its $418.6 million high.
    (Final prices include the buyer’s premium: 25 percent of the first $100,000; 20 percent from $100,000 to $2 million; and 12 percent of the rest. Estimates do not reflect commissions.)
    There will always be competition for classic examples by masters like Mr. Johns, and Sotheby’s sale featured one of his seminal “Flag” paintings, from 1983. Mark Lancaster, the British artist who had worked for Mr. Johns, was the seller. Although it was small (just shy of 12 inches by 18 inches), its rough encaustic surface — created from pigment suspended in wax — gave it a tactile quality that appealed to collectors. Four bidders went for the “Flag,” which ended up selling for $36 million, way above its high $20 million estimate.
    As soon as the gavel fell, rumors started circulating about who the buyer could be. Although Sotheby’s declined to comment, some dealers said it was bought by Alice L. Walton, the Walmart heiress who founded the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Ark.
    It is a big week for Andy Warhol, with Elvis Presley and Marlon Brando starring at Christie’s on Wednesday. Sotheby’s had less than top-flight examples, and the results were mixed. The best was a depiction of Elizabeth Taylor on a mint green background, “Liz #3 (Early Colored Liz),” which dealers said was being sold by Kemal Has Cingillioglu, a Turkish collector. It brought $31.5 million, about what Sotheby’s expected. Only one bidder went for “Self-Portrait (Fright Wig)” from 1986, estimated at $12 million to $18 million; it went for $11.3 million, not bad considering that it sold at Sotheby’s in London two years ago for $8.5 million.

    For the past several seasons, the German artist Gerhard Richter has been a major presence at auction, with mixed results. At Sotheby’s, however, “Abstraktes Bild,” a vibrant red 1991 painting estimated at $15 million to $20 million, sold to an unidentified collector for $21.4 million.
    Another abstract work, one of Cy Twombly’s blackboard drawing from 1967 — filled with the artist’s signature graphic loops, that was being sold by John Pappajohn, the collector and venture capitalist — was expected to bring $3 million to $4 million. It sold for $5.2 million.
    After the big Jeff Koons retrospective closed at the Whitney Museum of American Art last month, many said the market had had enough of his giant sculptures. But “Bear and Policeman,” a 1988 work, found a single bidder who paid the low $7 million estimate ($8 million including fees). But there were no takers for the artist’s “Moon (Yellow)” — a giant round stainless steel sculpture that belonged to the British artist Damien Hirst.
    After the auction Lucy Mitchell-Innes, a Manhattan dealer, called the sale “respectable,” adding that buyers were holding on to their money because “the material just wasn’t that compelling, and these days there are so many opportunities. If you don’t get something tonight, there’s always tomorrow night or any number of art fairs.”

    Friday, October 31, 2014

    TEST QUESTIONS

    TAKE HOME ESSAY EXAM...CHOOSE ONE QUESTION( PLEASE SITE THE NUMBER IN YOUR ANSWER) AND CREATE A MINIMUM TWO (2) PAGE DOUBLE SPACED RESPONSE.
    AT LEAST THREE SPECIFIC  ART, ARCHITECTURE ETC EXAMPLES ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT YOUR TEXT. THESE IMAGES SHOULD BE REPRODUCED ON A PAGE SEPARATE FROM YOUR TEXT/ANSWER.  THIS ESSAY PART OF THE EXAM WILL BE DUE AT THE VERY BEGINNING OF CLASS ON MONDAY NOV/3/2014.
    THIS PART OF THE EXAM WILL BE WORTH 4O POINTS. 

    Reminder: An "Image" identification exam will be given on Tuesday Nov/4/2014- this part of the exam will be worth 60 points.

    Great,Good Luck!


    (1)EXPLAIN THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN EGYPTIAN CONCEPTIONS OF THE AFTER-LIFE AND EGYPTIAN ART.


    (2)EXPLAIN THE CANON OF PROPORTIONS DEVELOPED BY EGYPTIAN ARTISTS. DOES THAT CANON STILL HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON CONTEMPORARY STYLE?


    (3)DEFEND OR DISPUTE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT—“THE NILE VALLEYINSPIRED THE PRIMARY MOTIFS IN ALL EGYPTIAN ART”.


    (4)THE NEED TO MAKE ORDER OUT OF CHAOS HAS BEEN WITH US SINCE THE CAVES AT LASCAUX. EXPLAIN HOW THAT NEED MANIFESTED ITSELF IN THE ART OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS.

    Thursday, October 30, 2014

    Color...such-as they speculate


    What Do Classical Antiquities Look Like in Color?

    "Cuirass Torso" (reconstruction), Acropolis, 460 BCE (2005), artificial marble, h: 57 cm, Stiftung Archäologie, Munich (all photos by Stephan Eckardt, Ole Haupt; all images courtesy Archaeological Institute Göttingen and Stiftung Archäologie, Munich)
    “Cuirass Torso” (reconstruction), Acropolis, 460 BCE (2005), artificial marble, h: 57 cm, Stiftung Archäologie, Munich (all photos by Stephan Eckardt, Ole Haupt; all images courtesy Archaeological Institute Göttingen and Stiftung Archäologie, Munich)
    Everyone knows that classical sculpture is white. Think of the gleaming marble of artworks like the Belvedere Torso and “Laocoön and His Sons” — the whiteness imparts a kind of purity, a sense of being the ground zero of Western culture, the original from which an entire civilization’s canon has sprung. Would we view these sculptures differently if they were in color?
    An exhibition currently on view at the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen is making the case for polychromy. Transformations: Classical Sculpture in Colour argues that “Antiquity was anything but sceptical of colour” and that “the white marble of Antiquity was merely a tenacious myth.” The show features around 120 pieces: original sculptures alongside experimental, colored reconstructions.
    Transformations grows out of the work of the Copenhagen Polychromy Network (CPN), an interdisciplinary research group that’s devoted to studying polychromy in ancient Greek and Roman sculpture. The network and its Tracking Colour project in turn were spurred by an initial exhibition examining polychromy at the Glyptotek in 2004. Ten years have passed since then, and considerable advances have been made.
    "Young Roman," 3rd century CE, marble, h: 0.26m, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, alongside its reconstruction
    “Young Roman,” 3rd century CE, marble, h: 0.26m, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, alongside its reconstruction
    “Research in ancient sculptural and architectural polychromy is an interdisciplinary venture combining the humanities and natural sciences. Technological developments in science are therefore affecting our field at an increasing rate,” CPN project coordinator and Transformations curator Jan Stubbe Østergaard told Hyperallergic over email. He continued:
    The examples are many. Multi spectral imaging (MSI) is becoming an important means of identifying pigments; isotopic analysis allows provenancing of lead based pigments; X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRF) and other spectroscopic analyses are providing us with evermore refined information. The combined result is that the complexity of ancient sculptural polychromy and its interfaces with the sculptural forms is gradually reemerging. But we are still at the beginning.
    Østergaard explained that the myth of monochromatic classical sculpture began during the Renaissance, when sculptures like the Belvedere Torso and Laocoön Group were discovered. “They were understood to be from classical antiquity, were therefore regarded as exemplary models — and they were perceived as being monochrome white, simply because their polychromy had largely disappeared over time. So, it was not a case of suppression, but of a misunderstanding by a small, highly cultivated and influential minority which was subsequently codified in art academies and transmitted on.”
    He went on to add, however, that “suppression — and repression — may come into it when studying 20th century reception of the fact established in the course of the 19th century that ancient sculpture had demonstrably been polychrome: this fact collided frontally with long established European aesthetical, ethical, ideological norms, ultimately with Western identity.”
    So, scholars have known for at least a century that classical sculpture was colorful, but that knowledge has not become common.
    So-called ‘Peplos Kore,’ original alongside reconstruction, Athens (540 BCE/2011), artificial marble, h: 130 cm, Stiftung Archäologie, Munich
    So-called “Peplos Kore,” original alongside reconstruction, Athens (540 BCE/2011), artificial marble, h: 130 cm, Stiftung Archäologie, Munich
    The Carlsberg exhibition may help change that (as well as a seemingly related exhibition mounted by the artist Francesco Vezzoli at MoMA PS1). But it’s admittedly a tough pill to swallow; looking at some of the before and after photos, what stands out (at least in this writer’s mind) is how … garish the color versions look, like a child might have painted the pigments on.
    “The role of color in ancient sculpture is a decisive one,” Østergaard wrote. “It is decisive for the visual aesthetics of the sculpture, obviously; it is as clearly decisive for the legibility of a narrative in a variety of ways, from the painting in of sandal straps and horses reins to the blood oozing over the skin of a wounded Amazon, and on to the proper identification of subject of a sculpture — the Archaic Peplos Kore is not wearing a peplos and is therefore not a young girl (kore), but a goddess as evident from the dress parts shown only  by way of painting.”
    Indeed, even without understanding those details, the color does bring the artworks to life in a particular way. It seems to undermine that sense of timelessness we often attach to them, instead anchoring the pieces in a specific context. In doing so, it makes them more human and, ironically, brings them closer to us.
    Caligula, (37-41 CE),, marble, h: 28 cm, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek
    “Caligula” (37-41 CE), marble, h: 28 cm, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek
    Caligula (reconstruction), 37-41 CE (2011), marble. h: 28 cm, Archäologischen Institut der Universität Göttingen and Stiftung Archäologie, Munich
    “Caligula” (reconstruction), 37-41 CE (2011), marble. h: 28 cm, Archäologischen Institut der Universität Göttingen and Stiftung Archäologie, Munich
    "Lion from Loutraki," Greece (c. 570-560 BCE), limestone, h: 53 cm, l: 100 cm, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek
    “Lion from Loutraki,” Greece (c. 570-560 BCE), limestone, h: 53 cm, l: 100 cm, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek
    "Lion from Loutraki" (reconstruction), Greece, c. 570–560 BCE (2003), plaster, h: 53 cm, l: 100 cm, Ulrike Brinkmann and Glyptothek München Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek
    “Lion from Loutraki” (reconstruction), Greece, c. 570–560 BCE (2003), plaster, h: 53 cm, l: 100 cm, Ulrike Brinkmann and Glyptothek München Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek
    "The Byzantine Empress Ariadne" (c. 500 CE), marble, h: 70 cm, Museo della Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterno
    “The Byzantine Empress Ariadne” (c. 500 CE), marble, h: 70 cm, Museo della Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterno
    "The Byzantine Empress Ariadne" (reconstruction, 2008), painted plaster, h: 32 cm, Museo della Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterno
    “The Byzantine Empress Ariadne” (reconstruction, 2008), painted plaster, h: 32 cm, Museo della Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterno
    Transformations: Classical Sculpture in Color continues at Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek (Dantes Plads 7, Copenhagen) through December 7. Francesco Vezzoli: Teatro Romano continues at MoMA PS1 (22-25 Jackson Ave, Long Island City) through March 8, 2015. For those who want to learn more, extensive information about objects and research methodology is available on the Tracking Colour website.

    Saturday, October 25, 2014

    Week of Oct/27th- Halloween ( UPDATED)

    Finishing up our discussions of the Greek Chapter-starting Monday ( please catch-up on your reading). This Friday (Halloween) you will be given your take home essay section (1) on Egypt- Essay/papers will be due at beginning of class Monday Nov/ 3rd. 
    A slide / image identification section (2) on Egypt ( Composed almost entirely of images from this blogs Egypt section)  will be given on Tuesday Nov/ 4th.

    Tuesday, October 21, 2014

    "DEATH BECOMES HER"


    The Met’s New Exhibit, ‘Death Becomes Her,’ Will Thrill Your Inner Goth

    By
    Photo: Courtesy of Metropolitan Museum of Art
    By 9:30 a.m. this morning, two women in full goth garb — one in a black lace veil, the other in a top hat — were gamely posing for tourists' photos on the steps of the Met. They were there, along with more traditionally dressed reporters, to preview the Costume Institute's latest exhibit, "Death Becomes Her," which opens tomorrow and focuses on mourning fashion from 1815 to 1915.
    While the concept is subdued, the 30-odd looks are surprisingly ornate up close — some gowns fall off the shoulder, as was the style of the era, and come in rich textured moiré and taffeta. These fabrics were, however, restricted to the later stages of grief, as they were considered too showy for the recently bereaved. As the 19th century wore on, mourning essentially became a cottage industry — at the height of the period, fashion magazines like Harper's Bazaar advised on the preferred styles, and, noted curator-in-charge Harold Koda, mourning warehouses were a popular purveyor of clothing. Queen Victoria and Queen Alexandra, whose dresses are highlighted in the show, also helped shape the public's concept of bereavement chic, with Victoria donning mourning clothing for the rest of her life after Prince Albert's death.
    The exhibit is simple and spare, befitting the subject matter, though it's not without its flashes of dark humor. (Even the merch is on point: a coffee-table book of medical illustrations and a book of morbid poetry displayed under a bell jar.) One quote projected on the wall comes from the 1867 etiquette manual Hints of Common Politeness: "When we see ladies persist in wearing sable, we are reminded of the reply a young widow made to her mother: 'Don't you see,' said she, 'it saves me the expense of advertising for a husband.'" When I asked her about the quip, assistant curator Jessica Regan explained, "This was often how widows were portrayed in popular culture, as using their mourning as something that was becoming and alluring." Koda broke in, "That's really double-edged, in that it's a very sexist read, because men were able to come out of mourning and they could remarry in a month. It was really unseemly for a woman not to go through full mourning." (Which, if you're keeping track, involved a year and a day of "full mourning," an additional year of so-called "half-mourning," and another six months of "ordinary mourning.") A series of comical etchings by Charles Dana Gibson (creator of the Gibson Girl) displayed the second room of the exhibition space depicts a young widow's adventures, which end with her joining a nunnery. Widows, Koda points out, were "a destabilizing force in pre–World War I society, because they're sexually knowing, and they're out on the market."
    Accessories, including elaborate black hats and parasols, have their own corner of the exhibit, along with Victorian mourning jewelry, which often incorporates the hair of the deceased. Looking at the styles on display, the crossover with contemporary goth and gothic Lolita style was obvious. When asked about the continuing appeal of this style of dress, Koda became pensive. "I have a personal theory. I think we're a generation where death is at such a remove, not for all of us, but the young people who embrace it, there's a kind of ability to fantasize about what death means." For fantasists of all stripes, the show will not disappoint.