HORROR VACUII
MIHRAB
QIBLA
IMAM
MINBAR
MAQSURA
MINARET
HYPOSTYLE HALL
MOSQUE:translation
Friday, December 13, 2013
Thursday, December 12, 2013
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Monday, December 9, 2013
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Well, well, well.
Three Rockwell Classics Bring Nearly $57.8 Million
By CAROL VOGEL
Published: December 4, 2013
Three paintings by Norman Rockwell celebrating homey, small-town
America, among the most popular of his 322 covers for The Saturday
Evening Post, sold at Sotheby’s on Wednesday morning for a total of
nearly $57.8 million, about twice their high estimate.
The Saturday Evening Post Illustration, owned by SEPS. Licensed by Curtis Licensing.
The Saturday Evening Post Illustration, owned by SEPS. Licensed by Curtis Licensing.
The Saturday Evening Post Illustration, owned by SEPS. Licensed by Curtis Licensing.
The auction house’s York Avenue salesroom in Manhattan, filled with
American art dealers and collectors, went dead quiet while a tense
nine-and-a-half-minute bidding battle played out for “Saying Grace,”
one of Rockwell’s best-loved scenes. It brought $46 million, well over
its high estimate of $20 million and the most ever paid at auction for
his work.
Two contenders on different telephones — one represented by Elizabeth
Goldberg, director of American art for Sotheby’s, and the other, Yasuaki
Ishizaka, managing director of Sotheby’s Japan — tried to buy the
painting, which ended up selling to Ms. Goldberg’s unidentified client.
The 1951 oil, which depicts a boy and an elderly woman bowing their
heads in prayer at a diner, topped a 1955 readers’ poll at The Saturday
Evening Post four years after it appeared. (The magazine paid Rockwell
$3,500 for the cover painting, equivalent to about $30,500 today.)
Wednesday’s auction price smashed the previous high flyer, “Breaking Home Ties,” depicting a fresh-faced boy leaving home for the first time, which brought $15.4 million at Sotheby’s in 2006.
Another favorite, “The Gossips,”
a finger-wagging montage of friends, neighbors and Rockwell himself,
was expected to bring $6 million to $9 million but was snapped up for
$8.45 million by another telephone bidder. When the image ran on the
cover of The Saturday Evening Post on March 6, 1948, the magazine was
flooded with inquiries from readers wanting to know what the heads were
gossiping about.
The third canvas, “Walking to Church,”
sold for $3.2 million to Rick Lapham, an American paintings dealer who
said he bought it for a client. Mr. Lapham was one of only two bidders
for the painting, from the April 4, 1953, cover of The Post. Rockwell
based its composition on a Vermeer painting, “The Little Street,”
translating the scene to fit his idealized vision of an urban street
scene, with family members in their Easter best, each clutching Bibles.
He used a composite of different buildings in Troy, N.Y., and a church
steeple in Vermont. The painting sold for $3.2 million with fees. It had
been expected to fetch $3 million to $5 million. Asked why there was
not more competition for the painting, Mr. Lapham replied, “It’s
stylistically different,” referring to Rockwell’s translation of an old
master painting.
(Final prices include the buyer’s premium: 25 percent of the first
$100,000; 20 percent from $100,000 to $2 million; and 12 percent of the
rest. Estimates do not reflect commissions.)
All three paintings had belonged to the magazine’s longtime art director, Kenneth J. Stuart,
who had received them as presents from Rockwell while the two men
worked together, from World War II to the eve of the Vietnam War. And
Wednesday’s auction was the final chapter in years of bitter legal
battles. When Stuart died in 1993, he left his entire estate to his sons
— Ken Jr., William and Jonathan — in equal shares. But shortly after
his death, William and Jonathan sued their older brother, Ken Jr.,
claiming that he had taken advantage of their ailing father, forcing him
to sign papers to gain control of the fortune and contending that Ken
Jr. had used estate assets for his own expenses.
The brothers, who were secreted in a skybox above Sotheby’s salesroom
watching the proceedings, only recently settled out of court.
Until the Rockwell works arrived at Sotheby’s this fall, they had been
on loan to the Norman Rockwell Museum in Stockbridge, Mass., for the
past 18 years. But during Stuart’s lifetime, “Saying Grace” had adorned
his office at The Post, and when he left the magazine, it hung in the
family’s living room in Wilton, Conn. “Walking to Church” had been in
the bedroom of Stuart’s wife, Katharine. (He never hung “The Gossips,”
according to his children.) Wednesday’s auction also included several
works on paper by Rockwell, also from the Stuarts. Top among them was a
color study for “Breaking Home Ties,” from 1954, which brought $905,000,
more than three times its $300,000 high estimate. Again, the buyer was
bidding by telephone.
Who bought the works remains a mystery. Sotheby’s isn’t saying, nor are
the buyers. Among this country’s top Rockwell collectors are the
filmmakers George Lucas and Steven Spielberg, as well as the businessman
H. Ross Perot and Alice L. Walton, the Walmart heiress. None could be
spotted in the audience or in any of Sotheby’s skyboxes.
Jonathan Stuart said that he had no clue who bought the family’s
artworks, but he said everyone was “very happy, exhilarated.”
“We set an American art record,” he added, referring to the $46 million
sale of “Saying Grace,” which Sotheby’s was touting as the highest price
ever paid for a painting at an American art auction. “It’s be
hmmmmmm
Augustine's World
What Late Antiquity says about the 21st century and the Syrian crisis.
BY ROBERT D. KAPLAN | DECEMBER 3, 2013
By 700 A.D., the Roman Empire had disappeared from the map of the West, the Sassanid Persian Empire had vanished from the Near East, Europe had become Christian, and the Near East and most of North Africa had become Muslim. During this era, poor, uneducated, and extremist Christian heretics and sectarians -- Donatists, rabble-rousing monks, and so on -- had dispersed around the Mediterranean basin, burning and terrorizing synagogues and pagan temples, before they themselves were overtaken in North Africa by Arab armies proselytizing a new, more austere religion. Meanwhile, Gothic tribes ravaged Europe, and Asia Minor was on the brink of an epic conflict between Christians who venerated icons and other holy images and those who glorified their destruction. Brown, in the course of a lifetime of scholarly work, gave a name to this pungent epoch in which the world gradually turned upside down: Late Antiquity.
Late Antiquity was dominated by vast civilizational changes, though many were not marked at the time. Writing about the Middle Ages that followed, the now-deceased Oxford University historian R.W. Southern noted, "This silence in the great changes of history is something which meets us everywhere." Late Antiquity appears full of drama only because we know its beginning and end. But on any given day during that half-millennium, the Mediterranean world might not have seemed dramatic at all, and few could have said in what direction events were moving.
Of course, the historical clock moves a great deal faster today, and thousands upon thousands of words -- in these pages alone -- have been written on the Arab Spring, the military rise of China, the tumult in the European Union, a nuclear Iran, and the chipping away of America's post-Cold War hegemony. But can we really discern any better than the denizens of Late Antiquity in what direction events are moving?
The erosion of America's role as an organizing power, which heretofore relied on public acquiescence and the inability of anyone else to challenge the status quo, has disoriented elites in Washington and New York whose own professional well-being is intimately connected with America's proactive involvement abroad. And few developments have been more evocative regarding the sentiment of splendid isolation creeping once again through the American citizenry, or more integral to understanding the weakening of the United States, than Syria.
Syria is the Levant, the geographical core of Late Antiquity. And its disintegration, like the crumbling of Libya, Yemen, and Iraq, along with the chronic unrest in Tunisia and Egypt, signifies not the birth of freedom but the collapse of central authority. Rome could not save North Africa, and the United States will not save the Near East -- for as the opinion polls demonstrate, Americans have had enough of foreign military entanglements. Anarchy, perhaps followed by new forms of hegemony, will be the result.
IF THE LIFE OF ANY INDIVIDUAL ENCAPSULATES Late Antiquity, it is that of St. Augustine, a Berber born in 354 in Thagaste, modern-day Souk Ahras, just over the border from Tunisia inside Algeria. In drifting from pagan philosophy to Manichaeism and finally to Christianity, which he subjected to the logic of Plato and Cicero, St. Augustine straddled the worlds of classical Rome and the Middle Ages. His favorite poem was Virgil's Aeneid, which celebrates the founding of Rome's universal civilization. He railed against the radical Donatists (Berber schismatics), whose heresy was undermining the stability of the Maghreb, even as he saw the benefits in traditional bonds like tribalism. And he died at age 76 in 430, in the midst of the assault of Genseric's Vandals on Africa Proconsularis, Rome's first African colony. His great work, The City of God, writes scholar Garry Wills, sought to console Christians who were disoriented by the loss of Rome as the organizing principle of the known world. Rome, St. Augustine wrote, could never satisfy human hearts: Only the City of God could do that. Thus, as Rome weakened, religiosity intensified.
We are at the dawn of a new epoch that may well be as chaotic as that one and that may come upon us more quickly because of the way the electronic and communications revolutions, combined with a population boom, have compressed history.
Consider that, in 1989, at the end of the Cold War, the United States was the unipolar military and economic colossus, the triumphalist liberal democracy captured by political philosopher Francis Fukuyama in his article "The End of History?" Since then, the European Union has expanded throughout Central and Eastern Europe, promising an end to the furies of the continent's past. Of course, the Middle East, from the Atlantic Ocean to the Indian subcontinent, was benighted and illiberal through the first years of the 21st century. But at least it was quiescent, if only by its own dismal standards.
Then the world broke apart. An attack on the American homeland by Muslim extremists led to two large U.S. ground invasions in the Middle East, which, in turn, helped set the region in motion. Decadent autocracies later crumbled and conservative monarchies were forced to make unprecedented concessions, even if President George W. Bush's Freedom Agenda did not turn out as intended. North Africa has since devolved into a borderless world of gangs, militias, tribes, transnational terrorists, anti-terrorist expeditionary forces, and weak regimes gripped in stasis. The adjacent Levant erupted into protracted low-intensity war, with only two strong legal entities left between the easternmost edge of the Mediterranean and the Central Asian plateau: a Jewish state and a Persian one (thus the centrality of Iran arguing for a rapprochement with the United States).
While this has happened, the European Union has begun to seriously stagger. A debt crisis, negative growth, and unseemly levels of unemployment have persisted for years as the welfare state -- that signature moral accomplishment of postwar Europe's politicians -- becomes in large measure unaffordable. The result is that the European Union itself, so dominant in the first two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, has lost some of its geopolitical force in Central and Eastern Europe, just as Russia has re-emerged as authoritarian and powerful, thanks to hydrocarbon revenues. The map of Europe is changing from one uniform color back to divergent shades, with national identities -- once presumed to be in retreat -- undergoing a resurgence.
As for China -- that demographic and geographical behemoth that has become the engine of world trade -- after almost a third of a century of unprecedented growth, its economy is finally slowing down. China's economy and military are still growing massively in absolute terms, but the future of the Middle Kingdom is less certain than it was just a decade ago. With ethnic minorities and Han Chinese both pining for more freedom amid fewer opportunities, it is possible that China might one day face a variation on the Soviet Union's fate.
Authority, once so secure and conveniently apportioned across the globe, seems in the process of disintegrating into small bits, with sects and heresies -- Salafists, cybercriminals, and so on -- entering from the side doors. The United States still reigns supreme economically and militarily, with immense stores of natural resources. Nevertheless, American power is increasingly stymied by these new and unpredictable forces. Sheer might -- tanks and jet fighters, nuclear bombs and aircraft carriers -- seem increasingly like products of an ever-receding Industrial Age. Yet the postmodern version of Late Antiquity has just begun.
Amid this panorama of global unraveling and new forms of sovereignty (a phenomenon that St. Augustine experienced 1,600 years ago), a curious observation has been made in the interstices: Tribes suddenly matter. Yes, tribes. They were the solution to checking the violence and undermining the religious extremists with their death cults in Iraq. They have been the dominating reality in Afghanistan, a world of clans and khels (what the Pashtuns call subclans). And when those reptilian regimes in North Africa and the Near East foundered, it was not democracies that immediately emerged, but tribes. This was particularly the case in Yemen, Libya, and Mali, but it was also true to a surprising degree in more developed societies like Syria, where beneath the carapace of sectarianism lay a grand guignol of tribes and clans, too many of which were infused with the spirit of holy war.
In St. Augustine's world of imperial collapse, these ancient ties offered some respite from disorder because within the tribe there was hierarchy and organization in abundance. But modernity was supposed to free us from these cloistered shackles of kinship. Indeed, modernity, wrote Ernest Gellner, the late British-Czech social anthropologist, means the rise of centralized authority and the consequent decline of tribalism. But the opposite is presently occurring: The crumbling of central authority throughout much of North Africa and the Near East (as well as the rebirth of lumpen nationalism in parts of Europe) indicates that modernity is but a passing phase. Today, tribes with four-wheel-drive vehicles, satellite phones, plastic explosives, and shoulder-fired missiles help close the distance between Late Antiquity and the early 21st century.
St. Augustine's North Africa, now with its degraded urban conurbations of cracked brick and sheet metal, will see its population increase from 208 million to 316 million by 2050, putting severe pressure on both natural and man-made resources, from water to government. As these millions move to the cities in search of jobs and connections, the political order will assuredly shift. Whatever arises by then may not be the states as they appear on today's map. Indeed, what we consider modernity itself may already be behind us. The headlines between now and then will be loud and hysterical -- as they are today in Syria -- even as the fundamental shifts will at first be obscure. For history is not only about convulsions, but about the ground shifting slowly under our feet.
In The City of God, St. Augustine revealed that it is the devout -- those in search of grace -- who have no reason to fear the future. And as the tribes of old now slowly come undone in the unstoppable meat grinder of developing-world urbanization, religion will be more necessary than ever as a replacement. Alas, extremist Islam (as well as evangelical Christianity and Orthodox Judaism in the West) may make perfect sense for our age, even as its nemesis may not be democracy but new forms of military authority. Late Antiquity is useful to the degree that it makes us humble about what awaits us. But whatever comes next, the charmed circle of Western elites is decidedly not in control.
Sunday, December 1, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)